Politics - Michael Gove

-
Last week we had the (almost) hysterical spectacle of Michael Gove, in the House of Commons, calling the SNP the Scottish Nationalist Party - when it is actually called the Scottish NATIONAL Party. Several SNP MPs immediately corrected him by calling out "national, national". 
Instead of retracting his error, Gove went on attack and insisted they were nationalists - in what was clearly intended to be an insult.
Does Gove not recognise the irony (or maybe the hypocrisy) of his words? I suspect he was fully aware but that this was just another example of a politician twisting facts to suit a personal and political point. 
As a leading light of the pro Brexit movement, Gove was a major figure in what was the UK nationalist movement (or, more accurately, the English and Welsh nationalist movement). To accuse the SNP of being nationalists, in such a derogatory way, is pretty rich given that his nationalism is far deeper than the SNP's!
To be clear, this UK government, including Gove, is seeking to divorce the UK from our European neighbors by as much as they possibly can (which could be quite a lot) - while the SNP seek, after gaining independence, to rejoin the EU. Who, given that information, can fail to see that the real 'nationalist' is Gove along with all the members of Johnson's government?
There are many, I accept, who query the SNP seeking independence while, at the same time, also seeking to rejoin an even bigger union than the UK ever was. In a recent interview Nicola Sturgeon made the SNP's position in this very clear. During the Brexit process the UK government totally ignored Scotland's view and needs in this process. The Scottish government came forward with several proposals which were intended to reduce the very negative aspects for Scotland that Brexit was likely to bring about - but all of these were rejected out of hand. On the other hand, the EU fully supported the Republic of Ireland in trying to prevent the return of a hard border between it and the north. Some unions work with consideration and respect for all it's members - while others only operate with self interest and arrogance towards it's smaller members. It's pretty clear to me which union provides a fairer union and which one would be best to avoid (or, in this case, escape from).
As mentioned in a previous post, I am no great fan of the EU and I'd rather an independent Scotland joined EFTA - but given the choice of only the UK or the EU then the EU is clearly a better option for Scotland. It is also quite clear that Michael Gove is more of a nationalist than the SNP is.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

COVID-19 - the rules and how they don't apply to Margaret Ferrier.

-
I see that Margaret Ferrier, the SNP MP who broke COVID-19 regulations without resigning, has resurfaced in parliament (although maybe only via video link). As an SNP supporter and member I feel I should comment. Firstly, it needs to be remembered that Ferrier actually had COVID-19 when she travelled between London and her home in Scotland (not to mention her other transgressions at the time) while, for example, Catherine Calderwood did not have COVID when she and her family travelled to Fife from Edinburgh (I believe it was). There was no chance Calderwood would have spread the virus unless someone in her party actually had COVID and the car they had travelled in had broken down and they had required road side assistance. Calderwood, admittedly after initial resistance, recognised her position was untenable and she fell on her sword. Ferrier, on the other hand, refused to do so - and still continues to do so. While the SNP acted quickly, and correctly, to remove the whip from her, she...
Read more

UK politics - Boris Johnson's performance and the potential ramifications for Scottish independence.

-
There has been a huge outcry in recent weeks about Boris Johnson, and other cabinet ministers, holding Christmas parties for staff last year while, at the same time, locking down the country and banning such parties for the ordinary citizens of the country. Worse was the fact that relatives of those dying were unable to visit their loved ones and be with them one last time. Even worse was the fact that the Tories seemed to have found this amusing and laughed about their own ignoring of the restrictions - while everyone else suffered. This was nothing but Tory privilege and disrespect showing it’s ugly face, once again. There is not much more that can be said about this, and better writers than myself have said all that needs to be said. What I want to consider are the possible outcomes of this behaviour. There are ramifications for the Tory party and there are also (I hope) ramifications for Scottish independence (which I’ll explore later). As David Cameron recently said, Johnson can g...
Read more

Politics - The Labour Party and anti-Semitism

-
Foreword. I am aware that the term ‘anti-Semitic’ is incorrectly used in what follows - but it has become the accepted term for anti-Jewish. The Jews, originally, were a Semitic people - but so are all the Arab peoples of the Middle East. The term anti-Semitic, therefore, applies to the Palestinians just as much as to the Jews, which makes the use of the term, when applied only to Jews, incorrect. But, as said above, it has become accepted that the term anti-Semitic also means anti-Jewish so I have resorted to using it, if somewhat reluctantly. To be clear, all references to anti-Semitic, in this post, should actually be read as anti-Jewish. I currently find myself rather confused over the position of the Labour party and anti-Semitism. For four years, under Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour party was increasingly accused of anti-Semitism - or, at least, failing to even attempt to eradicate anti-Semitism from within it’s ranks. I don’t know if this was true or not as I did not read more than a...
Read more